Friday, February 29, 2008

the first question

The first question remark at the debate is now being used to say Hillary is weak and a complainer. Tucker today. Her remark was to the point the Messiah never has to think on the spot. He is able to take his time and respond to her question rather then having to pose his ideas by himself.” I agree with Hillary” or to rephrase her response as he did with the Russia question! That is what she was complaining about!

It is an injustice to our country to have such a biased press. It will be the down fall of our entire democracy. I hope the Internet can save our society and combat the mega corporations that control our supply of information.

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

Yahoo! I finally heard some one stand up against the Race Baiting that has been tagged to Hillary. Paul Bagale called them on it and said NAME ONE TIME SHE HAS RACE BAITED? The Jesse Jackson remark! PLEASE!! Paul had a come back. The press loves to slam Hillary.
Wisconsin today we will see if they have COME TO OBAMA and drunk the Kool Aid !
The Messiah obama will fail if he gets elected. The to be Obama first lady said this is the first time she is proud to be an American. WOW what a first lady she"d make.

Friday, February 8, 2008

msnbc debate

Hillary Clinton should not debate on MSNBC. Let's face facts MSNBC has lost all sense of journalistic principles regarding bias in journalism. Chris Matthews and now Keith and even Nora have lost it. They hate Hillary and fawn over Obama more then the Obama Girl herself. They have been the most disrespectful news cast as well. We all know the debate will draw millions of viewers. Why should this bag of wind unprofessional network be rewarded with such viewer statistics? The entire network has become a joke!

Sunday, January 27, 2008

Boycott GE

James Clyburn is not surprised by the outcome in South Carolina. He is pleased the voters over came their racial animus . That is the white voters did, not the black voters. Barack got over 80% of the black vote. Now if that isn't voting for race what the hell is? The media has won! BOYCOTT GE FOR INTERFERING WITH OUR DEMOCRACY WITH SUCH BIASED HATRED AND MISREPRESENTATION OF FACTS. MSNBC HAS FUELED THE FIRES OF RACISM FOR RATINGS AND PROFIT.

Friday, January 25, 2008

media mistakes

Because there are no major policy differences between Clinton, Obama and Edwards the media has become enamored of Obama on the basis of looks and personality. They have chosen the cool kid in the class with the ready smile and the boyish good looks over the intellectual girl with experience and maturity.The general tone of their coverage is that whatever Barack says and does is inspirational and what Hilary says and does is crassly political, divisive, and racial. In raising the racial issue the media may trigger a white backlash if people percieve that African Americans are voting for Obama simply on the basis of color.The Clintons have been true friends of minorities in this country throughout their careers. It is not by accident that Bill has been called " The First Black President ". If Hilary is elected, African Americans and women of all colors can count on her to keep fighting to advance policies that are important to them. Voting for Obama is a fun fantasy to indulge in temporarily but his demonstrated lack of experience is too dangerous for the times we live in. By November I trust that the majority of Americans will have had enough of what the media has been force feeding us and vote for Hilary who will provide experience and level headed maturity in addition to a womans perspective. Being President involves making difficult decisions that impact people in a very real way, you cannot just cast a "present "vote and let others do the heavy lifting. He or she will be tested by our enemies. Do we want someone who after thougtful reflection will respond in a measured way ala Bill Clinton or do we want a rash response ala George Bush?The Republicans know that their only chance to retain the Presidency is for Barack to be the party nominee. They know they cannot defeat Hilary. By electing Hilary we can be sure that she will work to undo all the dangerous and costly policies of the present administration. She will have her experience as First Lady and as a Senator to draw from as well as the experience of the most popular President since JFK. Her husband Bill Clinton. The media had an obligation to question Bush"s words and policies leading up to the war and failed. they also failed to expose the 935 lies that this administration has told us. Why should we trust them now?

Thursday, January 24, 2008

ONLY A PAWN IN THEIR GAME

Bob Dylan said it best ONLY A PAWN IN THEIR GAME. http://www.bobdylan.com/songs/pawn.html
The media has turned our two best candidates in years or even history into racist petty fighting cats and dogs.
I just heard Leo Terelle"some radio talk show guy" screaming on MSNBC how the black people will not come out to vote if Hillary is the nominee . NOW THAT'S SMART! I watched this unfold. Right after the NH loss by Barack CNN and MSNBC started questioning the TOM BRADLY effect. Michael Eric Dyson and Donna Brazel both questioning whether the people in NEW Hampshire were telling poll takers they voted for Barack but the racist they are couldn't pull the lever for a black man. Then came the Martin Luther King JR. to LBJ comment the media jumped all over saying Hillary was a racist for dissin MLK. Certainly questionable at best and taken totally out of context. Then came the Fairy Tale Remark again HOW was that Racist yet the media was all over it. Then came the drug use by Barack with the Hillary campaign and next BET founder Jhonson.
OK that is the chronology as I see it.

I do have to ask how is any of this racist except in the eyes of the media who want it to be racist to get ratings.
Drug use is racist to whom? I've been to many twelve step program meetings and I will tell you flat out DRUGS DON"T CARE WHAT COLOR RACE, RELIGION OR HOW RICH OR POOR YOU ARE! I fail to see how this is a racial issue. The media wants it to be but how is it? Furthermore the Martin Luther King Jr. needing LBJ to help fulfill his dream is fact not racial or anything but. Hillary was pointing out that Barack was a dreamer not a realist or a doer. That was not racist but questioning his lack of experience. Finally the "Fairy Tale" once again putting in question Baracks voting record since his campaign is based almost exclusively on that one issue. Not racially motivated at all.
So only a pawn in their game but today the pawns are the politicians and we the people, and the chess masters are the major corporations that control the media.

TIT FOR TAT

This is an analogy that I think makes sense. They call the Clinton camp a machine and Obamas an insurgent. If you are building a skyscraper "our gargantuan government" would you hire a guy with a hammer and a few friends to build it or would you hire a guy with a MACHINE? Our system of government works with a TIT FOR TAT system. I scratch your back you scratch mine. This system is what gives smaller states and smaller groups a voice. In a perfect world all laws and focus would be based on a collective merit system but this is not a happily ever after society. This is the real world. The Clintons for better or worse have a lot of "political capitol" favors to collect on alot of back scratching that has been done by them and for them hence the MACHINE. That is why they are choice for me. They will be able to get things done in a hurry. They know all the players.

Boy do I miss Moms cookin

Contributors